Current Status of the Project
Purpose of Each Plant
As stated elsewhere, this project consists of two plants: one at 40MW, 200MWh and the other at 500MW, 2.5GWh.
The purposes of the 40MW plant include:
- Demonstrating the technology profitably;
- Enabling the financing of the 500MW plant;
- Providing balancing and ancillary services to the distribution grid.
The 500MW plant will do the same for the transmission grid.
We have now completed the technical feasibility of the 40MW plant in conjunction with Costain and Fortum, the former undertaking static modelling including various sensitivity analyses, and the latter undertaking dynamic modelling using their industry-leading Apros system.
We have now applied for CCEF funding of a Study to take both plants to “shovel ready”, the 40MW by mid 2020 and the 500MW by the end of 2023 and expect to hear in Q 1-2 2019. We will follow with a Works application to part-fund the construction of the smaller plant; if granted without imposing any delay, then it should be operational mid 2022; the larger plant would then be operational in 2027. “Shovel ready” includes:
- Front End Engineering Design (FEED) to the point of letting contracts;
- Obtaining planning permission from the local authority (40MW) and the Planning Inspectorate (500MW);
Obtaining a grid connection offer from the Distribution Network Operator (DNO – Scottish
- Power Energy Networks);
- Completion of cavern preparatory work (for 40MW, further analysis; for 500MW, design);
- Grid connection studies to the distribution (40MW) and transmission (500MW) grids;
- Detailed design.
We will undertake a public consultation with each planning application, details of which will be published either on this website or on the SPV’s website (to which this site will link) at the appropriate times.
“The system is robust and works well under all the sensitivities tested during this study. For the base case the round trip (i.e. grid-to-grid) efficiency calculated was 63.1%, with a range of 61% to 63.5% depending on findings of further study work (particularly the thermodynamic modelling of the caverns) and prevalent ambient conditions. The dynamic simulation conducted by Fortum show good correlation with the results of this study stating efficiencies of 62 to 64%. Previous works by Oswald Consultancy and Siemens put the efficiency at 62.3 and 62.7% respectively, albeit the process setup was marginally different.
“It is expected that further improvements to the efficiency should be achievable during the Front End Engineering Design Phase, with a close collaboration between the heat storage, compressor and expander suppliers.”
March 2020 Annual Report
In 2019, Storelectric:
- Received a letter of support from MHPS (Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems) which validated our technologies, stated that they can build it from current equipment, may provide an EPC wrap for a plant and are considering investment;
- Undertook a feasibility study for a new site nearby, as back-up to the first site identified for CARES;
- Revised the design of the TES (Thermal Energy Subsystem) and had it validated by Fortum – it:
- Simplifies the design,
- Improves the efficiency to 63.5% (from 62.5%).
- Uses off-the-shelf thermal storage rather than bespoke manufacture with standard technologies, reducing its price and improving robustness;
- Again applied unsucessfully for CEF funding. This time the project was fund to be sufficiently mature, the next logical step, in need of funding and with a “sound and complete” implementation plan. It fell short on the international dimension (justified but no relevant letters of support) and urgency
We are re-applying in 2020 fr CEF funding – for the smaller plant only – while we still qualify in the Brexit transitional year.
March 2019 annual report
In 2018 Storelectric applied unsuccessfully for CEF funding, received strong and positive feedback and will reapply in 2019. Nevertheless, progress continues with further discussions with the planning authorities, work on the revenue streams, reaching out to potential recruits, pursuing the selectrion of various partners / contractors. A lease option agreement on the 40MW caverns has been submitted to the owner’s board following local approval.
March 2018 Update
We have completed wildlife/habitat surveys, consultations with on planning, technical validation of the TES CAES technology by both static and dynamic modelling with numerous sensitivity analyses, and a feasibility study on converting two ethylene storage caverns to use for CAES with excellent results from a planning viewpoint.